From: petsim <?????????????????????>
Subject: Pipe Stuff
Hi Steve:
Again, thanks much for the web site and Digest. I discovered you
through a couple of web searches for pipe-related info that yielded
issues of the Digest. I was taken by the tone, sought you out, and I'm
very happy that I did.
Tried pipes about 40 years ago and loved them and the tobacco.
Because I was then very much on the hop and pipes weren't a quick smoke,
I went (back) to cigarettes. Subsequently drove a cab in NYC and found
that I couldn't tolerate the cigarette paper and additives in addition to
the steady diet of exhaust fumes, so I went to cigars (Danneman cheroots
from Brazil as an everyday and an occasional Royal Jamaica as a treat).
After the cab, back to cigarettes.
The pace is a bit slower now and I've re-discovered pipes. Thus far
I have a Savinelli, Wilke, Nielsen, two Petersons, a meerschaum-lined
LaRocca, and two meerschaums. Several points and questions have arisen
that I thought to ask here.
The Nielsen is an estate pipe and presents a couple of questions.
It's a brandy shape and on top of its oval shank are the words "Neilsen"
- "handmade" - "in Denmark", from top to bottom (w/ top and bottom lines
forming an oval). On the bottom of the shank is "MADE IN DENMARK" over
"962". Would anybody know anything about the manufacturer and age of
this pipe? The stem is a replacement so there is no stylized "bj" that
would indicate a Bjarne (somewhere I saw the name Bjarne Nielsen).
The pipe also has an unusual taste (certainly different from any
other pipe that I've smoked). The briar feels (somehow) harder and less
porous than my other pipes. The grain is busy and varies from vertical
to cross to swirls, depending on which part of the pipe you're looking
at. It doesn't look or feel to be lacquered or anything else artificial,
but it keeps a high lustre. It adds its own dry, sharp (tart, but not
sour) taste to whatever tobacco I smoke in it. The taste is not
unpleasant, but the tongue bite is! It seems to be mellowing as it gets
smoked, but I can't tell whether I'm riding a tiger that will be tamed
into a good friend, or whether the pipe's a dud and that's why the first
owner got rid it. Has anybody had a similar experience?
The Savinelli is identified on the box as a Virginia 606. Is the
number in any way a size designation? I would call it a bent billiard.
The pipe seems to have a juice-niche just below the draw hole. The good
news: it catches juices and leads to a dry, quiet smoke. The bad news:
only twice have I been able to run a pipe cleaner from bit to bowl. The
cleaner goes to the juice niche, leaving untouched a channel from the
draw hole @1/8" into shank. Does that 1/8" represent enough of a residue
problem to take the pipe apart after every smoke (increasing the risk of
a loose stem)?
I mentioned that the LaRocca was meerschaum lined. After purchasing
it, I read somewhere that meerschaum linings are often not made from
block but, instead, are compacted from meerschaum dust. I tried a web
search but found no specifics about LaRocca pipes. The pipe smokes fine
and my taste buds are certainly not up to sensing a distinction.
However, as a fact collector (I'd rather have 'em and not need 'em ...),
I'm curious. Does anybody know anything about LaRocca pipes?
I have been unable to find the Hacker and Ehwa books. With your
more-than-3000-strong readership, would it make any sense to approach the
pertinent publishers? They might find a run of a couple of thousand to
be profitable and attractive.
I skimmed quickly over much of the politically-oriented material in
the earlier Digests as being past and, therefore, dead. The basic
issues, of course, are very much alive. Whatever happened to "the Land
of the Free"? I stand ready to call, write, and vote, and I'm pleased to
believe that I'm not alone in doing so.
Peter Sims
?????????????????????
[Even with 3669 members this issue, a reprint of the Ehwa book
probably wouldn't be worthwhile. But I thought the Hacker book was
still in print! A search on Amazon for "pipes" yields several
interesting results. -S. ]
~\U ~\U ~\U ~\U ~\U ~\U ~\U ~\U ~\U ~\U ~\U ~\U ~\U ~\U ~\U ~\U ~\U